Wilhelm Steinitz
Fischer’s Top Ten
Bobby Fischer
Bobby Fischer’s Top Ten Players of All Time.
His insights into these players is remarkable and he may well hit the nail on the head in the evaluation of their strengths and weaknesses.
|
Paul Morphy |
Howard Staunton |
Wilhelm Steinitz |
|
Siegbert Tarrasch |
Mikhail Tchigorin |
|
Alexander Alekhine |
Jose Capablanca |
|
Boris Spassky |
Mikhail Tal |
Sammy Reshevsky |
For Fischer’s complete write-up on each player –
See http://www.chesshistory.com/winter/extra/fischer4.html
King’s Gambit / Steinitz’s “Best” Game ?
by National Life Master Loal Davis
.
The King’s Gambit is a chess opening that begins with the moves:
1. e4 e5
2. f4
White offers a pawn to divert the Black e-pawn so as to build a strong centre with d2–d4. Theory has shown that in order for Black to maintain the gambit pawn, he may well be forced to weaken his kingside.
The King’s Gambit is one of the oldest documented openings. It was examined by the 17th century Italian chess player Giulio Polerio and before that by Luis Ramirez de Lucena.
The gambit has always had an ardent following, but few World Champions have ventured into its depths. Nevertheless it was played by the first official World Champion Wilhelm Steinitz. After that I think you have to look to the games of Boris Spassky and Bobby Fischer, though neither ventured it during a World Championship match.
“The Golden Treasury Of Chess” contains the following game with the inference that it may well be the greatest game that Steinitz ever played. It is certainly a game worth study and is one of my favorites.
Steinitz versus Simonson New York, 1883
1. e4 e5 2. f4 exf4 3. Nf3 g5 4. h4
It has taken awhile, but the consensus is that White, instead of ‘shuffling a piece in the name of development’, should strike at the ‘base’ of the Kingside Pawn structure to liquidate/remove/weaken/attack/whatever to really gain freedom and central control.
g4 5. Ne5 h5
Greed. Both 5… d6 and 5… Nf6 attack and develop while fighting for control of the center.
6. Bc4 Nh6 7. d4 d6 8. Nd3 f3
A ‘clever’ plan to ‘mess up’ White’s position on the Kingside while winning the Pawn on ‘h4′. Unfortunately the more important center goes to White.
9. gxf3 Be7 10. Be3
Since the King is going to flee, Steinitz provides a little niche while harmoniously developing all of his pieces around it.
Bxh4+ 11. Kd2 gxf3 12. Qxf3 Bg4 13. Qf4 Nc6 14. Nc3 Ne7
Black has concocted a ‘clever’ way of defending that Bishop on ‘h4′ while sliding the Knight into ‘g6′ to drive White back – or so he thinks.
15. Raf1 Rh7
White To Move
16. Rxh4 Steinitz ignores the ‘threat’ and in the process takes a full three minor pieces (nine points) for his Queen. Ng6 17. Rxg4 Nxf4 18. Rgxf4 c6 What to do? If White’s Knight gets into ‘d5′ then it hops into the ‘soft’ ‘f6′ square. 19. Rf6 Deflection. Black’s problem is that his forces are split and ineffective while White’s forces are working in perfect harmony. Ng4 20. Bxf7+ Kd7 21. Be6+ Kc7 22. Rf7+ Rxf7 23. Rxf7+ Kb6 24. Bxg4 hxg4 25. d5+ c5 26. e5 Once again striking at the ‘base’ of the Pawn chain. Ka6 Black is ‘prepared’ to let the ‘d’ Pawn go and build a ‘shelter’ with ‘b6′. Steinitz has another surprise for him.
White To Move
27. Bxc5 This looks like another ‘sacrifice’; this time a Bishop for three Pawns. Although a full equivalent, Steinitz has yet another surprise. dxc5 28. Nxc5+ Kb6 29. Rxb7+ He lets the Knight go. What does he have in mind? Kxc5 30. Kd3 Ouch ! ! Centralization. The control over the ‘c4′ and ‘d4′ squares means that White is threatening mate in two ways. One is ‘Rb5#; the other is ‘b4#’. Notice that Black has no useful checks to distract from this diabolical plan. Qa5 What else? 31. b4+ Qxb4 32. Ne4+ Black must now give up his Queen for the Knight. The resultant King and Pawn ending is a simple win. Bravo. 1-0 For the PGN file – See CommentsRook Odds / Not So Strange
Odds is a term used in chess when things are not ‘even’ – or in this case when the material is not even. This handicap play used to be much more prevalent than it is today – and much has been lost. This used to be the way a ‘lesser’ or beginning player could cross swords with the ‘mighty’ and still have a chance. It was a way to measure progress and avoid the continuous pummeling that is usually the plight of the ‘up and comer’ while still facing good/strong opposition.
Rook Odds is a substantial handicap that would normally be overwhelming. When the Odds are artistically overcome it is a sight to behold. The following three miniatures are cases in point. They are played by the prominent players of their day with the White pieces. Remove White’s Queen Rook, or the Rook on ‘a1’. Enjoy.
London / 1789
Philidor versus Cotter
1. e4 e5 2. f4 d5 3. Nf3 exf4 4. exd5 Qxd5 5. Nc3 Qe6+ 6. Kf2 Be7 7. d4 Nf6 8. Bxf4 Ne4+ 9. Nxe4 Qxe4 10. Bxc7 Nc6 11. Bd3 Qe6 12. Re1 Qxa2 13. Bb5 Bd7 14. d5 Qxb2 15. dxc6 bxc6 16. Bxc6 Bxc6 17. Rxe7+ Kxe7 18. Qd6+ Ke8 19. Qxc6+ Ke7 20. Bd6+ Kd8 21. Qc7+ Ke8 22. Qe7# 1-0
New Orleans / 1849
Morphy versus Le Carpentier
1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. d4 exd4 4. Bc4 Bb4+ 5. c3 dxc3 6. O-O cxb2 7. Bxb2 Bf8 8. e5 d6 9. Re1 dxe5 10. Nxe5 Qxd1 11. Bxf7+ Ke7 12. Ng6+ Kxf7 13. Nxh8# 1-0
London / 1873
Steinitz versus NN
1. e4 e5 2. f4 Nc6 3. Nf3 Nf6 4. fxe5 Nxe4 5. d3 Nc5 6. d4 Na6 7. Bc4 Qe7 8. Nc3 h6 9. O-O g5 10. Nd5 Qd8 11. Nf6+ Ke7 12. Nxg5 hxg5 13. Qh5 Rxh5 14. Ng8+Ke8 15. Bxf7# 1-0
All Three PGN Files – See CommentsWilhelm Steinitz
Wilhelm (later William) Steinitz (May 17, 1836 – August 12, 1900) was an Austrian-American chess player and the first undisputed world chess champion from 1886 to 1894. Some contemporaries and later writers described him as world champion since 1866, when he won a match against Adolf Anderssen. Steinitz lost his title to Emanuel Lasker in 1894 and also lost a re-match in 1897.
Statistical rating systems give Steinitz a rather low ranking among world champions, mainly because he took several long breaks from competitive play. However, an analysis based on one of these rating systems shows that he was one of the most dominant players in the history of the game.
Although Steinitz became "world number one" by winning in the all-out attacking style that was common in the 1860s, he unveiled in 1873 a new positional style of play and demonstrated that it was superior to the old style. His new style was controversial and some even branded it as "cowardly", but many of Steinitz’s games showed that it could also provide a platform for attacks as ferocious as those of the old school. Steinitz was also a prolific writer on chess, and defended his new ideas vigorously. The debate was so bitter and sometimes abusive that it became known as the "Ink War". By the early 1890s, Steinitz’ approach was widely accepted and the next generation of top players acknowledged their debt to him, most notably his successor as world champion, Emanuel Lasker.
Games of Steinitz









